CourseConnect AI
Academic integrity
CourseConnect is built to help you understand your classes, not to produce the work you turn in for them. That distinction sounds small. It is actually the single decision that shapes almost everything the app will and will not do.
I could have built the version that just answers everything, no questions asked. It would have been an easier product to build and, honestly, an easier one to market. It also would have made the thing worthless the moment you closed the laptop and sat down for a closed-book exam. So I built the other one.
Most "we care about academic integrity" pages are a paragraph of good intentions with nothing behind them, written by a team that never touches the product. I built this one myself, so here is what is actually built into the app — not just written here.
Grounded answers
The tutor answers from your syllabus, your lecture notes, and your course materials — not from a generic pass over the internet. That is a safety feature as much as a quality one: an answer tied to a source is checkable, in a way a confident guess is not.
Shown reasoning
Explanations come with the steps that got there, not just the final number or the final sentence. If you cannot reproduce the reasoning yourself afterward, the explanation did not do its job.
No submission format
There is no button that produces a polished essay, a completed problem set, or a finished discussion post ready to paste in. The outputs are built to be studied from, not turned in.
Practice, not proxy
Quizzing and worked examples exist to check whether you actually learned something, and to surface the gaps before an exam does. They are not a way to get graded work done through a side door.
A clean list of dos and don'ts only gets you so far. Most real situations are messier than that, so here is where I actually stand on the questions that come up.
My professor explicitly allows AI tools. Does any of this still apply?
Yes — the behavior does not change based on your syllabus policy, because I have no way to verify what your professor actually allows. What changes is your risk, not my defaults. If your class permits AI assistance, you can lean on the tutor more heavily for drafting and ideation; the app still will not submit work as you, because that line is about what CourseConnect does, not about interpreting your school's rules on your behalf.
I do not know what my class allows. What should I do?
Ask, before you use anything that could be read as AI-assisted work. Policies vary wildly by professor, department, and even by assignment within the same class — a syllabus that bans AI on essays may say nothing about using it to study for the multiple-choice final. When in doubt, the safe default is to use CourseConnect for understanding and practice, and to write the actual submission yourself.
Is asking it to help me brainstorm or outline okay?
Brainstorming and outlining are closer to studying than to submitting — you are still the one doing the thinking and the writing. This is the kind of use case that sits in the gray zone across most academic integrity policies, which is exactly why it is worth checking your specific class rules rather than assuming.
What if I paraphrase an AI answer instead of copying it directly?
Paraphrasing does not change what the work is. If the reasoning, structure, or content originated from the tool rather than from you, most academic integrity policies treat that the same as copying it — and so do we. The tutor is built to help you reach an answer, not to hand you one to reword.
A shortcut that skips the learning is the one thing that makes a class pointless. Not against a rule — pointless, in the plain sense: you paid for the credit, sat through the lectures, and walked out having learned nothing you can use the next time it matters, whether that is a closed-book exam, a job interview, or the next class that assumes you actually know this one.
If CourseConnect handed you the answer instead of the understanding, it would be solving the wrong problem — optimizing for the assignment getting done instead of for you getting better at the thing the assignment was measuring. That trade might feel fine in the moment. It stops feeling fine the first time you need to actually know the material and discover you never did.
Use it the way you would use a genuinely good TA: to get unstuck, to have something explained a different way, to check whether you actually understood it. Not to get out of the work. That is the whole policy, really — everything above is just the specifics of what that looks like in practice.
iOS · TestFlight
No card, nothing that expires, nothing held back for a paid tier. It is free while I build it — and you will hear it from me before that changes.